#Free hong kong drama license

This is only one conspiracy theory, but I believe thereвЂ™s a lot more behind вЂ“ the China government has no doubt be involved in the TV license matter. Now, we can spend no more than US$0.1 a minute!Д¬ombining the fact that Li Ka-shing, the ultimate owner of PCCW, had been saying to the market that heвЂ™s going to sell off a couple local businesses, includingВ ParkNShop, which triggered the marketвЂ™s nerves вЂ“ IS LI KA-SHING RETREATING FROM HONG KONG?Д¬oincidentally, Li announced that heвЂ™s not selling ParkNShop after all, soon after the license was granted to PCCW. We used to pay US$2 a minute for IDD back then if not more. Ricky Wong,В HKTVвЂ™s founder, years ago founded CTI which basically targeted the telecommunications industry and forced the then monopoly, PCCW, to engage in a price war вЂ“ introducing competition in the market and bring the service prices of internet and international direct dial (IDD) down dramatically. Why the sudden change of tune? Why only iCable and PCCW, two telecommunications giants that have pretty much dominated the industry for years, are granted the licenses?

Reports have been leaked, and all pointing to the fact that the recommendation made by independent consultant(s) and Executive CouncilвЂ™s original proposal was to issue licenses to all three applicants, including HKTV. When public interest is involved, the government has the obligation to disclose details to ensure that the fairness and transparency of the evaluation is understood. The Executive Council refused to disclose details about the evaluation and claimed that itвЂ™s all confidential. Bear in mind the fact that HKTV only applied for an free-to-air TV license that does not take up any of the public air wave, meaning that even if HKTV can get the license, people wonвЂ™t be able to watch any of the programmes without a decoder box. reporting a false exclusive story on JiangВ ZeminвЂ™s death, producing close to zero programmes but repeatedly broadcasting the same shows over and over again for years)Д®xactly why ATV still holds one of the two free-to-air TV channel licenses is beyond believe. The government continues to allow ATV to operate despite major scandals and horrendious quality of TV production (e.g.Timothy TongвЂ™s case is still lingering after all the evidence has been pulled out.

The HKSAR government dropped all charges against Sally Aw claiming that her prosecution involves вЂњmajor public interestвЂќ and didnвЂ™t give any further explanation.

ThereвЂ™s a trend here, since the handover of sovereignty: If thatвЂ™s the case, do us all Hong Konger a favour, donвЂ™t report at all. My attention was drawn to two words in this sentence вЂњthey seeвЂќ вЂ“ ItвЂ™s either the journalist failed to investigate into the core of the issue, or they simply cannot be asked to report about Hong Kong properly. Why did people take it to the street? According to BBC: вЂњThousands of people have taken to the streets of Hong Kong to protest against what they see as a lack of government transparency and accountabilityвЂќ. The police in Hong Kong said there were 20,000 took it to the street yesterday, but being there from the early time (skipped the rally, but went straight to the Government Headquarter) to observe the flow, I am pretty sure that the number was closer to 80,000 or even 120,000.

Free hong kong drama